wild animals have no place in the 21st century. some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

biological diversity has never been so threatened as it is today as a result of the process of human civilization. the various forms of pressure created by human activity have destroyed natural balance, led to the deterioration of natural habitats, genetic erosion and the rarity, even disappearance, of a number of plant and animal species.

as the pace of civilization accelerates, more people, taking more space, needing to use more natural resources, engaging in ever-growing consumption, impose severe deterioration on the habitat of animals. an increasing number of people come to realize that the disappearance of animals will result in serious threat to the equilibrium of ecosystem. simply put, the extinction of hawks, a rat-eating bird seen in many regions, will result in the rapid propagation of rats. and rats, further, will destroy the prairies and threaten the other animals like gazelles, zebras and others, who live on grass and green lands. the coexistence of animals and human beings creates perfect harmony and brings about the vividness to our planet.

it is hard to imagine what our world would be like without animals. sociologists also point out that the disappearance of animals can cause social and economic problems. animal trade, as a supporting sector to the world economy, was very active before. however, the situation is beyond control since animal trade is very profitable and alluring. many species cannot escape the adversity of being killed.

certainly, our diet cannot be without meat. there are living stocks, which can provide us with sufficient and nutritious produce. therefore, we need not to resort to wild animals, especially the endangered ones. to protect animals is to protect our living environment. every individual should join efforts to keep the diversity of animals.

雅思作文真题及范文篇2

the argument correctly states the importance of the governments and large businesses but underestimates the significance of individual human beings in the campaign against environmental problems.

governments and large businessesplay positive rolesinmaking the earth healthierby reducing the amount of pollutants which humans put into the ocean, sea, river, lake,and atmosphere. the main functions of governments in this campaign are in the field of policy making and legislation. to make policy is to scientifically, effectively, and efficiently organize people, resources, and funds to improve the environments. in this glorious activity launched by man against nature businesses provide financial support in the form of donation and the like. p&g, hp, and ibm all contribute much annually in this concern.

while emphasizing the crucial functions of the governments and businesses, we should not be distracted from the vital roles every individual human being plays in this great and glorious global project. children, adults, and the elders all are indispensable in cracking the hard nut of pollution and consumption of limited resources. in our dailyroutine, each human being is expected to save the electricity, water, and fossil fuels. for instance, a child is expected to switch off the light when leaving the classroom. in agricultural production, each farmer is supposed to use less pesticide and sufficiently protect the water and soil from erosion. in industrial activities, each employee should conduct his or her activity with environmental ethic concerning. if all people work together, struggle together, and pray together, we will win one day in the future. yes, lets share the only dream in the diversified world.

in conclusion, if governments, businesses, and individuals all contribute to the environmental programs and projects, then we human beings will enjoy a healthier and happier life in this globe.

雅思作文真题及范文篇3

you should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

some people believe that the spread of tv has made families less closer. to what degree do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

you should write at least 250 words. you should use your own ideas of knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

as one of the most important inventions of the past century, tv is playing a more and more important role in modern life. however, some people are starting to worry about its negative effects on traditional families. i am convinced that the existence of tv has brought about alienation among family members.

first, watching tv occupies our time to municate with our families. tv provides a ready means of relaxation for people who spend their days doing routine and busy jobs. as soon as tv enters into our home, most of our free time is controlled by it. what is more, the one-eyed monster requires absolute silence and attention. if any member dares to open his mouth, the others order him to shut up immediately. therefore we municate less with our family members.

furthermore, families often quarrel over what programs they should watch. thanks to hardworking tv workers, we enjoy more tv channels and more colorful tv programs. but a question has arisen: it is difficult for families to choose a mon channel because they have different interests. it is inevitable to given rise to quarrel among them.

in addition, poor-quality tv programs can have severe effects on people’s mood and behavior. for instance, a person who watches too many idealized programs may bee unrealistic. in addition, unhealthy programs which contain obscene and violent contents may cause people’s curiosity.

in conclusion, i think that tv indeed has led to alienation among family members. we should be aware about the problem. something should be done as soon as possible to protect the families from the negative effects of television. for example, we should reduce the time spent in front of the little screen and spend more time with our families together. (290 words)

雅思作文真题及范文篇4

introduce the mentioned opinion and give your own opinion.in recent years, animal protection has become an issue of concern. people take different attitudes toward the increasing attention and expenditure on wildlife

conservation. some people suggest that the spending should be redirected to helping other fields in our society. i agree with the view that the investment in wildlife protection is not worthwhile.

give specific reason and details for the opinion mentioned in the question.

animals, as a key component of the whole food chain, have a profound impact on the sustainability of an ecosystem. as we know, every kind of animals plays an important role in natural balance.for example, the demise of any species will lead to the species will lead to the growth or decline of other species.in some extreme cases,some species may be at the verge of extinction such as dodo bird. if people did not take actions to protect wildlife as soon as possible, we humans will be affected in the end.

give specific reason and details for the opinion of yourself.

however, there are more issues that we need to focus in our society rather than protecting animals.in current social context,the primacy task is still to improve living standards since there are many people living under the poverty line.only when people are in a good living condition can they pay attention to other social problems.besides technology and education are another two aspects for governments to concern, these two industries accelerate the development of society, which will provide a better protection for wildlife in turn.

in conclusion, although the animal is a significant part of ecosystem, it’s better for governments to invest more finance and resources in other social problems.

雅思作文真题及范文篇5

雅思写作小作文范文解析

该线性题目描述了4个发达国家在过去200年间人均身高的变化。很明显总体趋势都是上升，并且在第一个世纪除了持续波动，身高变化不大。在之后一百年，都是显著上升趋势。既然总体趋势相似，重点应放在国家之间的对比。范文共计9句话。

雅思写作小作文范文

the line chart illustrates how the average heights of people had varied in four developed countries over two centuries from 1775 to 1975. generally, the heights underwent an overall upward trend across all the countries.

initially, americans ranked the top, with an average height of approximately 168 cm which was immediately followed by british (166cm) while people from denmark and france were slightly higher than 160 cm.

over the following seven and a half decades, in spite of some minor ups and downs, the average heights had almost remained unchanged in all the countries except france where people’s height kept rising in the latter half of the period. this exceeded that of the danish in around 1850.

after that, the trend in the usa and the uk showed great similarity though at a slightly different rate. they saw an ongoing rise until 1975, when the height equaled to approximately 180 cm. the danish grew considerably and became the tallest at almost 190 cm, standing in remarkable contrast with french who were merely 173 cm.

in short, while americans and the british were equally high in the end, the gap between danes and frenchmen had widened.

雅思作文真题及范文5篇相关文章：